Start Here
I built this site so a reviewer does not have to guess where to click.
A resume gives the overview, but the portfolio shows the work behind it: ServiceNow SecOps, Vulnerability Response, incident response, malware analysis, forensics, GRC, OT/ICS security, cloud security, HCI, and software foundations.
Best first path: Resume → ServiceNow SecOps → CYBER 440 Capstone → Projects → Contact.
Fast Review Path#
Resume#
Start here for the quick professional picture: education, credentials, experience, and best-fit roles.
Start
ServiceNow SecOps#
This is the most career-aligned part of the portfolio. It shows how I think through Vulnerability Response workflow, ownership, remediation, validation, and closure.
Primary Focus
CYBER 440 Capstone#
This is one of the strongest academic projects. It connects phishing, malware activity, forensic images, memory artifacts, logs, impact, and remediation into one incident response story.
Flagship Evidence
Projects#
Use the project gallery to see the full course-coded evidence map across malware analysis, forensics, GRC, risk, cloud, HCI, software, OT/ICS, and internship work.
Evidence Map
Capabilities#
Use this page to connect skills to evidence. It is the quickest way to see what I can credibly discuss in an interview.
Skill Evidence
What to Read First#
For ServiceNow SecOps#
Start with the ServiceNow SecOps Lab Hub and ServiceNow VR Triage Checklist.
These pages are closest to the work I want to keep building on professionally.
For GRC and Risk#
Start with IST 456, IST 432, SRA 311, and CYBER 342W.
That path shows risk thinking, cyber law, privacy, incident planning, and security management.
For OT/ICS Security#
Start with the OT/ICS Security section and the IST 451 ICS/IT-OT DoS Lab.
This is a developing specialty interest, focused on cyber-physical risk, operational disruption, availability, and recovery validation.
For HCI and Workflow Design#
Start with IST 331 User-Centered Design and the sudoRunner Portfolio Website.
These explain why I care so much about usability, clear navigation, and workflow design.
The Short Version#
What Not to Read First#
Some pages show progression rather than headline evidence. IST 240, IST 242, IST 250, SRA 221, and SRA 231 are useful supporting pages, but they are not where I would send a reviewer first unless they specifically ask about software foundations, early web design, information security basics, or decision theory.